Tiring. Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 I prefer this lens than the 70-200/2.8. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . No, Mr. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. Juksu, your point is well taken. Nice image, andysea. :). People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras - Amazon.com The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. There's just nothing there. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. http://www.idyll.com/135. Its nice to have the F/2. As soon as e.g. AF is accurate and very fast. Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM (72mm filters, 0.9m/3' close-focus, 25.0 oz./708g, about $1,035.) Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. Robert. Contrasty but not harsh. If you can afford it buy this lens, you will love it. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! It is by far the fastest focusing, best bokeh, and lowest light lens you will ever find. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. You just panned the subject for his photos and then turn around and needle thematic for looking into Ericsson. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Using a Canon EF 24-105mm Lens for Astrophotography - AstroBackyard Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. Some people do not like this and consider Bokeh to refer only to the rendering of out of focus points of light. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. however i started to realise how every subject might actually be a cardboard cutout being photographed. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. A Bargain, very competively priced I do not like this. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? @juksu - you're such a liar. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". It's gross, all is a matter of balance and the perfect one, given you want sharp and fuzzy elements in your picture, is in the blend, and the way details seems to disappear gracefully (while keeping a level of readability). SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Everyone should have one? And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? As the reader reviews below testify, this is an absolutely stellar lens, probably one of the sharpest and most distortion-free that Canon makes. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. Overall, spectacular lens. Simple as that! No more inside shooting with flash! Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. Sme of the wide field are. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. I have only owned my 135mm for less then a year, but already it is one of my top three most used and most fun lenses. Show some humility and don't troll. Well saturated but neutral. Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. Amazing sharpness wide open at F2.0 and the focus ring is nice and firm not tight you don't really need to tape it down for astrophotography. I would! This way you get both lenses with only one! The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. It always happens to me with Samyang, it makes good glasses, fast and sharp, I want to have them, but they are not comfortable to use, not in Sony E, their focus is not precise, and they are not "so" cheap. Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 That setup will give you all that you really need. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. A con is that it really makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Yes, she's isolated. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. Yes there's bokeh. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 Given the spot on DPR front page, lots of 'what-lens-should-I-buy' newbies will be spending their money on this one. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. Add To Cart. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Review - Imaging Resource I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? Sure, the Nifty 50 is an incredible value (and a LOT cheaper), but the 135mm puts you within range of some of the best astrophotography targets in the night sky. It improves slightly stopped down. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. Aperture ring. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! A quick question, I have a Sony a6300 mirrorless camera which is great but the sensor is very close behind the mount. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. CAs: a little in the OOF area - not disturbing anyway. Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments.
Pend Oreille County Commissioner Candidates, Reset Abode Gateway, Tesco Pregnancy Test Positive After 10 Minutes, Plattsburgh State Hockey Tickets, Oak Hill Wv Unsolved Murders, Articles C